Nevermind that I'm totally not into Mila Kunis' barnyard-Candian-Tuxedo babe look on the August cover of Glamour, the shot looks a little, I don't know, Photoshopped?
I love Mila just as much as the next girl (even if she is hooking up with resident douche Ashton Kutcher) and I know she's impossibly beautiful, but her cheeks look a little too artificially sunken in for my taste. Even beyond that, the retouchers completely changed her eye color from bright green to light brown. Um, isn't it usually the opposite?
| Related: Mila Kunis Would Internet Date If She Didn't Act |
| Related: Picture This: Mila Kunis Without Makeup, Still Flawless |
In the issue, Mila spills about her affinity for internet dating, her plans to get preggo in the future, and putting her graffiti skills to work for the Obama campaign. The best part, perhaps, is when she talked about her Black Swan body. Hey Mila, how'd it feel to lose 25 lbs for the role, you skinny bitch?
"This is my normal body. It’s not 98 pounds. God, I’m probably 25 pounds heavier in muscle mass and weight at this point. What was crazy was, when I was shooting Black Swan, everyone was like, 'Gosh, you’re really too skinny.' Then my weight started bouncing back and they’re like, 'She looked better when she was anorexic-looking.' You can’t please anyone! It was just for work. I didn’t do it because I had issues. Now this is my normal weight that I started outwith. There was no shape, no form, nothing, nothing."
What do you think about the 28-year-old's Glamour cover? Is it too heavily Photoshopped for your taste?
---
Follow on Ology: Lauren Caruso | FashionOlogy
Follow on Twitter: @laurencaruso_ | @Fashion_Ology
Comments (4)